Learn More


Published on September 12th, 2019 | by Emergent Enterprise


HTC Vive Cosmos VR: Price, Release Date, and First Hands-on

Emergent Insight:
Sam Machkovech from ArsTechnica offers an in-depth review of the new HTC Vive Cosmos and doesn’t hold back on the truth. His review is full of the good, bad and ugly of the Cosmos with an array of first impressions. It’s curious that HTC is launching what they deem a “mainstream” VR headset that is still tethered to a computer. Users want and need to be set free from the cable and have a user experience that includes a lightweight and comfortable headset.

Original Article:
Photo source: Sam Machkovech

HTC’s first PC-VR product with “inside-out” tracking is intriguing, but is it enough?

SEATTLE—After nearly a year of teases, HTC has taken the full wraps off its next PC-VR headset, the Vive Cosmos. The company invited me to its American Vive headquarters to confirm a release plan: starting October 3, HTC will begin selling the full system for $699, and this system finally dumps the old HTC Vive “lighthouse” tracking boxes in favor of built-in, “inside-out” tracking cameras.

However, HTC also invited me to test the Cosmos in a few VR games, and while I didn’t test for long enough to put together a definitive review, I’m currently left wondering whether HTC’s latest VR system has what it takes to compete with either the pricier Valve Index or the best of the industry’s cheaper, inside-out tracking headsets.

One step forward, one step back?

On a technical level, Vive Cosmos introduces a new pair of VR lenses that take a one-step-forward, one-step-back move compared to similar lenses in the HTC Vive Pro. Cosmos reportedly has a slightly increased “combined” resolution for both eyes, up to 2,880 x 1,700 compared to the Vive Pro’s 2,880 x 1,600 resolution. HTC reps insist that this new panel additionally beefs up the subpixel resolution to reduce the inherent “screen door” effect seen in older VR headsets.

The thing is, Cosmos dumps HTC’s usual OLED panels in favor of fast-switching LCDs, a shift we’ve seen in a range of new VR headsets over the past year. Like the other good ones, Vive Cosmos’ LCDs indeed take advantage of a boosted subpixel resolution without suffering from ghosting, and they run at the VR industry’s standard refresh rate of 90Hz. But LCDs aren’t up to the same color reproduction snuff as OLEDs, and the Vive Cosmos headset I tested had arguably the most muted color palette I’ve seen in a 2019 LCD headset. I was directed to a “vibrant” color toggle to try to fix this, but it didn’t do the trick.

What’s more, I didn’t have newer VR panels to compare the Cosmos to at the event, just 2016’s original HTC Vive. So I can’t speak clearly to why the Cosmos’ high-resolution panels looked a bit smeary. Some text reproduction was surprisingly blurry in apps like the Museum of Other Realities, which might be an issue with how the headset handles its subpixel arrangement; the HP Reverb has a similar pixel-smoothing system in place, and that’ll likely be up to users’ preferences, in terms of how they feel about it.

Also, that resolution count doesn’t tell the whole story. The Vive Cosmos doesn’t use an extra 100 pixels of vertical resolution to increase its apparent field of view (FOV). Maybe I’ve just gotten used to the Valve Index, but the Cosmos felt a bit claustrophobic in practice, in terms of its “110 degree” FOV rating.

Inside-out questions

In order to dump the older Vive systems’ reliance on lighthouse tracking boxes, HTC has opted for a whopping six-camera array on the Vive Cosmos. Four sensors scan ahead, above, and below the headset on its front face, while an additional pair of sensors flanks the headset’s left and right sides.

But my own personal red flag went off when I asked HTC’s reps for my favorite testing app: Beat Saber. This game is a great measure of “normal” VR hand movement for a couple of reasons: it doesn’t require waving hands behind the head (where cameras traditionally can’t track), but it still demands a mix of wild gesticulation and rapid movement to beat its rhythm-matching levels. HTC didn’t have a copy of the game handy, the reps said.

Instead, I was offered a sword-swinging app, which simply asked me to wave my hands ahead of me to parry and strike foes. This motion was decidedly less intense than what’s required from an “expert” Beat Saber song, yet I was still left feeling concerned. For one, something about the Vive Cosmos’s tracking array kept losing my hands for “acceptable but noticeable” split seconds on a regular basis.

This same issue stopped me from recommending many first-generation Windows Mixed Reality headsets, which also relied on built-in sensors and inside-out tracking. If this keeps up with the final, shipping Vive Cosmos, I’ll be singing the same pessimistic tune. I’m somewhat confident that HTC can fine-tune this issue ahead of the October launch, but it’s definitely noticeable for HTC’s first big inside-out tracking product.

Heft in the hands: Not necessarily good news

Worse, there’s something else amiss. HTC has finally seen fit to replace the old Vive wand controllers with a controller comparable to Oculus Touch, and that should be nothing but good news. It feels sturdy in the hand; it offers a nice array of joysticks, buttons, and triggers; and it maps 1:1 with Oculus’ solid standard array, plus bonus buttons that don’t get in the way.

To continue reading, go here…

Tags: ,

About the Author

Emergent Enterprise

The Emergent Enterprise (EE) website brings together current and important news in enterprise mobility and the latest in innovative technologies in the business world. The articles are hand selected by Emergent Enterprise and not the result of automated electronic aggregating. The site is designed to be a one-stop shop for anyone who has an ongoing interest in how technology is changing how the world does business and how it affects the workforce from the shop floor to the top floor. EE encourages visitor contributions and participation through comments, social media activity and ratings.

Back to Top ↑